- Tailored to your requirements
- Deadlines from 3 hours
- Easy Refund Policy
Organizational structure and culture are integral components of any group. They are intertwined and directly affect each other, shaping and guiding workplace performance. The two concepts are cohesive in maintaining employees' work efficiency, coordinating delivery, and ensuring higher productivity. Despite varying across organizations, they are a force to be reckoned with by the industry. The corporate mission, culture, and structure shape employees' behavior and underline their actions to materialize objectives. A strong culture creates employees' sense of belonging and commitment towards achieving the desired goal. The paper will discuss Amazon and Microsoft's excellent organizational structures within the corporate industry.
Microsoft Corporation
Microsoft Corporation is a competent company that has dominated the digital market for many years. The company's structure believes in innovation, agility, flexibility and uniqueness in the market. It has maintained its innovation because of the employees' stronger management structure and culture (Moşteanu, 2020). Its leadership emphasizes providing businesses and individuals with technologies and products that increase efficiency, capability, speed, and innovation. In achieving the mission, Microsoft has employed a competent organizational structure and culture that motivates the employees to become more innovative. In this case, the company applies a cross-functional organizational structure characterized by stronger leadership and competent productivity. A cross-functional structure allows the company to produce interactive and compelling digital products addressing market needs. Its management ensures that products are the best in the industry. In this case, they have influenced their employees to become more innovative and deliver competent product designs that solve problems within the industry and on corporate platforms.
Leave assignment stress behind!
Delegate your nursing or tough paper to our experts. We'll personalize your sample and ensure it's ready on short notice.
Order nowAmazon Company
Amazon Company is one of the giant e-commerce businesses in the US and global markets. It uses a Hierarchical corporate structure where the CEO owns the company and makes the final decisions (Solanki, 2019). The company's mission is to maintain its customers' obsession, keep the passion for innovation, and commit to operational excellence. Amazon's organizational structure is described by unrealistic performance standards, work culture, and employees' competence for productivity. It emphasizes an innovation culture to help the company create an inclusive environment that supports productivity. Beneath the CEO is the office of the top executives responsible for solving problems and shaping the company's culture (Solanki, 2019). The management emphasizes invention and customer-centric operations to achieve financial and market sustainability. As such, the company trains its employees and improves their competence to maintain its brand in the industry. Workers have adopted the culture of innovation to meet the customer-aggressive approach meant to support the company's values. They take advantage of the current markets to improve their skills, learn from different backgrounds, and implement their skills so that the company remains competent.
Leadership in the Global Settings
Microsoft Company's organizational structure and leadership remain competitive on local and global platforms. As one of the most competent businesses worldwide, Microsoft has strong leadership that motivates its employees to appreciate the culture of innovation and effective business operations to improve future performance value (Pamucar et al., 2019). For instance, it has established distinct products, including effective internet services, digital content distribution, and consumer electronic innovation. The management makes decisions and allows the employees to make interactive contributions to perfect new ideas. Workflow is gained as each department works on its product and makes consultations to improve performance. Because of its vast management system, every department works to achieve its fiscal objectives. Such openness and interaction allow effective collaboration in decision-making to improve workflow.
Amazon's structure includes the CEO at the apex. Decisions are made by the CEO and a few top executives (Solanki, 2019). The mission is to maintain innovation and invention, which is vital in maintaining market value. The objective of the business is to allow the trickle-down management to give directives on management and operations. Decisions are hierarchical because they are derived from the top management to the employees. It differs from Microsoft, which has flexible management where consultations are made during decision-making. At Amazon, the delivery and workflow are spread across different departments. For instance, the marketing team is responsible for familiarizing with the market, the sales team delivers products to the market and stores, and the logistics team focuses on providing products to the customers.
Analysis of their Culture
Amazon and Microsoft are the best because of their competitive innovation. They have invested in innovation and teamwork to motivate employees to adjust to the novel environment (Pamucar et al., 2019). Workers are encouraged to become more creative to achieve their objectives and goals through agility. Such motivation focuses on excellence through the intensive implementation of new testing ideas and development to attain organizational strength (Solanki, 2019). Their corporate culture has allowed diversity, which continues to promote innovation, networking, and improvement in the output of each employee. Through flexible workplace performance, employees intervene with the invention, the company adjusts to market changes and intervenes to remain competent.
Strategic Ways Managers Can Improve Structure and Culture
Managers can improve their structure and culture through effective strategic practices. First, managers can build shared values as the bedrock of an excellent corporate culture (Pamucar et al., 2019). Core competencies and cultural values help the management respect each team member, center its value on serving customers, and improve innovation to achieve its goals. Secondly, the managers can invest in diversity and inclusion to create a sense of appreciation. Diversity promotes innovative and onboarding practices that build competent human resources and encourage the company to promote workplace teamwork. Thirdly, the company's managers can ground the culture of mutual trust (Primc et al., 2020). In such an environment, employees feel safe, have equal chances to succeed, and ultimately succeed in their focus on success. Mutual trust creates a clear avenue for team members to engage and be honest with each other. It is an important virtue that brings the workers together for the common good of the organization.
Ensuring Team-Oriented, Collaborative, and Inclusive
Both Amazon and Microsoft can engage their employees using different strategies. First, the management should bring people together to solve problems (Pamucar et al., 2019). Resonating the objectives and goals of the businesses encourages the companies to have a common culture where employees are motivated to work toward a common goal. Especially in a competitive environment, creating an opportunity for cross-functional collaboration ensures that employees expand their internal and external networks when solving problems (Pamucar et al., 2019). They can brainstorm on issues and leverage diverse perspectives to find solutions. Such an intervention will create a flexible bureaucratic system that ensures an oriented, collaborative, and inclusive workforce.
Secondly, the company should use a platform where staff can connect and interact to establish good social relationships. Good relationships are achieved through diversity. Inclusion through diversity brings different cultures together (Pamucar et al., 2019). In such a way, it is easy for companies to solve problems by attracting skills from various backgrounds. As a result, teamwork will increase, and employees will be motivated to coordinate and work cohesively to improve performance. The culture of collaboration and team orientation involves organizational interaction. It uses social and corporate bonds to create a positive environment. Most successful companies have demonstrated the strength of unity, collaboration, and working on common goals to establish a competent environment (Pamucar et al., 2019). Such an environment ensures that employees are flexible and can engage others through interactions, sharing ideas, uniting in solving organizational and market problems, and finding solutions to future challenges. In such a way, the companies will have a substantial market value to achieve their desired business successes.
Conclusion
Managerial structure and culture are core values in the corporate industry. They allow companies to focus on specific objectives and missions over a particular period. Companies use such opportunities to thrive and identify weaknesses to strengthen their business position despite the competition. In this case, Amazon and Microsoft have demonstrated a resilient organizational structure with an influential culture. Cultural factors include innovation, employees' commitment to solving problems, and a competent workforce. The businesses must understand the internal and global market systems and operations through such a structure. They use such metrics to improve their innovative means to achieve their mission and objectives. Emphasizing teamwork and motivation will increase transparency and the ability of any company to remain relevant in the industry. The favourable organizational structures for Amazon and Microsoft motivate the companies to have a common goal. Objective and focus on diversity to advance novelty and flexibility to achieve success.
Offload drafts to field expert
Our writers can refine your work for better clarity, flow, and higher originality in 3+ hours.
Match with writerReferences
- Kabeyi, M. J. B. (2020). Corporate governance in manufacturing and management with analysis of governance failures at Enron and Volkswagen Corporations. Am J Oper Manage Inform Syst, 4(4), 109-123. http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajomis
- Moşteanu, N. R. (2020). Challenges for organizational structure and design as a result of digitalization and cybersecurity. The Business & Management Review, 11(1), 278-286.
- Pamucar, D., Knežević, N., Macura, D., & Đorović, B. (2019). A fuzzy model for organization structure design with human resource allocation. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 24(3), 81-96. https://management.fon.bg.ac.rs/index.php/mng/article/download/234/173
- Primc, K., Kalar, B., Slabe-Erker, R., Dominko, M., & Ogorevc, M. (2020). Circular economy configuration indicators in organizational life cycle theory. Ecological Indicators, 116, 106532. https://www.academia.edu/download/84310209/main.pdf
- Rehman, S. U., Bhatti, A., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2019). Mediating effect of innovative culture and organizational learning between leadership styles at third-order and organizational performance in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40497-019-0159-1
- Solanki, K. (2019). 'To what extent does Amazon. Com, Inc success be accredited to its organizational culture and ND Jeff Bezos's leadership style?. Archives of Business Research, 7(11), 21-40. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7776/412a7bf591b2fef98db84f7271c7ad327b6b.pdf