- Tailored to your requirements
- Deadlines from 3 hours
- Easy Refund Policy
Environmental changes have occurred on this planet often due to slow, gradual processes and drastic, abrupt changes. These environmental changes have contributed significantly to the evolutionary history of life on Earth. When conditions change in any way, species either have to evolve to fit the new conditions or go extinct. This process brings about evolution, where new characteristics, behaviours, and species are created as it takes its course. However, over the last few decades, environmental change has advanced rapidly due to human activities, posing an unprecedented threat to the biota. Environmental changes are highly selective forces that induce quick evolutionary adaptations in populations, changing the dynamics of species interactions and restructuring communities and ecosystems at different spatial scales.
Climate Change and Evolutionary Responses
Climate change is one of the most crucial environmental changes that impacts the evolutionary process. Throughout the history of planet Earth, global warming and cooling periods have been shown to significantly influence the geographic distribution of species and even their rates of evolution (Mathes et al., 2021). In the Pleistocene epoch, for instance, small glaciation and deglaciation cycles contributed to oscillations in geographical distribution that favoured allopatric speciation and adaptive radiation in different taxa (Kimmitt et al., 2023). In the context of the anthropogenic climate change currently being witnessed, many species are demonstrating rapid rates of evolution. One of the most documented cases includes changes in phenology or the timing of life cycle events in various plants and animals. For example, many bird species begin to breed earlier in the spring because of peaks in insect abundance, and their food source during the breeding season occurs earlier (Andreasson et al., 2022). This shift in breeding time is partly due to phenotypic plasticity, but studies have shown that genetic changes are also occurring, indicating evolutionary adaptation.
Another interesting example of a response to climate change is the body size of animals. According to the widely recognized Bergmann's rule, the population from the colder regions is typically more significant in a particular species than those from warmer regions (Bogin et al., 2022). With the increase in global temperatures, researchers have found a decreasing body size in various taxa, such as birds and mammals. This decrease in body size results from thermal-stress adaptation in animals (Bogin et al., 2022). Climate change also shifts species’ ranges, increasing contact among previously separated populations or species. These new interactions can generate explosive evolution through mechanisms like character displacement or hybridization. For instance, as species adapt to a relatively warmer climate, movements of organisms to higher latitudes have resulted in the growth of regions of contact. This aspect has brought about new hybrid species or has seen one species assimilate the other genetically.
Leave assignment stress behind!
Delegate your nursing or tough paper to our experts. We'll personalize your sample and ensure it's ready on short notice.
Order nowHabitat Fragmentation and Population Genetics
Another environmental change with a significant evolutionary impact is habitat fragmentation, which results from human activities, including deforestation and urbanization. When habitats are split or broken, population sizes decrease, resulting in low levels of interbreeding and high levels of genetic drift (Yu et al., 2020). This can lead to erosion of genetic variation in the populations, thereby setting the populations at a disadvantage in adaptation to future changes in their environment. Small, isolated populations are likely to have more inbreeding due to the increased occurrence of incestuous matings, and this leads to inbreeding depression or the decrease in the general fitness of offspring because of the inherited expression of recessive deleterious genes (Robinson et al., 2022). This, in turn, can result in what has been described as an “extinction vortex,” where shrinking population and reduced variability reinforce, resulting in local exclusion.
However, habitat fragmentation facilitates genetic divergence between populations as well. Although there is decreased genetic access among populations, populations may be more flexible to the prevailing physical environment to create new local ecotypes or species (Waqar et al., 2021). When gene flow decreases, such a diversification process is described as “isolation by distance” (Jiang et al., 2019). One good example of the effects of habitat fragmentation at the evolutionary level is the Florida Panther. The destruction of their home range in Florida saw the fragmentation of their habitat, which contributed to inbreeding depression and a decrease in genetic fitness in the remaining panthers (Tian et al., 2022). Some conservation activities included translocating Texas cougars to enhance the population genetically, an activity known as genetic rescue. This intervention resulted in rapid improvements in fitness-related characteristics, proving that management efforts could reduce the impacts of fragmentation on species’ evolutionary prospects.
Pollution and Adaptive Evolution
Chemical, noise, and light pollution are new challenges and stressors that organisms must cope with. The evolutionary responses to pollution offer some of the best examples of rapid adaptation to human-caused environmental challenges. A classic illustration is the development of metal tolerance in plant species when they grow on contaminated sites. Where mining activities have contaminated soils with heavy metals, scholars have noted the development of new robust ecotypes resistant to heavy metals in the studied plant species (Papadopulos et al., 2021). These tolerant populations grow more slowly and must be more competitive in uncontaminated sites, highlighting the costs of adapting to a contaminated substrate.
It has also been amazing how aquatic ecosystems have adapted in the face of contamination. The Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) is now able to withstand a polluted environment that contains polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in estuaries with high pollution indexes along the east coast of North America (Papadopulos et al., 2021). Studies conducted on genealogical relationships have determined that this tolerance has evolved in various species and, in some instances, by similar genes, hence a case of convergent evolution due to Anthropogenic Pollution (Sackton & Clark, 2019). Another factor that has been observed to cause evolutionary changes in animal vocal communication is noise pollution, especially within cities. For example, many bird species have switched the pitch of their songs to higher frequencies because the low-frequency noise prevalent in cities can obscure them (Halfwerk et al., 2011). These changes might also be due to behavioural plasticity, though there is evidence of a genetic shift in some species to support the processes of evolution.
Light pollution is another example of an environmental change that impacts evolution and mainly affects organisms active at night. Research shows that artificial light at night can affect the timing of copulatory activities in many species of animals, which may lead to a mismatch between their reproductive activities and resource abundance (Closs et al., 2023). A few studies have noted that some urban bird populations are already experiencing changes in light sensitivity and circadian rhythms compared to rural populations due to artificial lights, proving that fast evolution can occur in response to a new environment.
Invasive Species and Evolutionary Dynamics
Introducing invasive species to an ecosystem makes for a profound environmental change. It can cause profound evolutionary ramifications for the invaders and the natives of the ecosystem in question. It is also established that invasive species can evolve quickly, making them effective in invasion (Li et al., 2023). An excellent example of such rapid adaptive evolution in any invasive species is Australia's cane toad (Rhinella marina). Since their release in 1935, cane toads started to spread quickly in northern Australia and evolved longer legs and more vigorous stamina, and they can now move around quickly (Shine & Baeckens, 2023). This process has been described as spatial sorting, meaning that individuals that spread fastest are on the invasion front and, therefore, reproduce rapidly, increasing their spreading rate.
Another impact of invasive species is that they cause evolutionary alterations in native species. The invasion of a new predator, competitor, or pathogen puts considerable pressure on native species' adaptations and can result in rapid evolutionary changes. For example, after introducing the toxic cane toad in Australia, several species of native snakes evolved decreased head sizes relative to their body size, reducing their ability to consume the giant, toxic toads (Shine & Baeckens, 2023). This adaptation occurred over just a few decades, highlighting the potential for rapid evolution in response to invasive species. In some cases, the presence of invasive species can lead to character displacement in native species. This occurs when two similar species compete for resources, leading to a selection for traits that reduce competition. For example, the invasion of the Asian shore crab (Hemigrapsus sanguineus) on the Atlantic coast of North America has brought about evolutionary modifications in the native mud crab (Panopeus herbstii) (Rato et al., 2021). The mud crabs have been observed to have larger claw sizes in areas where both species share an ecosystem, likely due to aggressive interaction and competition for shellfish prey.
Ocean Acidification and Marine Evolution
Ocean acidification, which occurs when seawater absorbs increasing atmospheric CO2, gives rise to another form of environmental change in marine ecosystems. This process is altering the chemistry of the world's oceans at a faster and faster pace, presenting a variety of challenges to the organisms living there, particularly those that construct shells and other skeletal structures such as corals, molluscs, and some of the plankton species (Leiva et al., 2023). There is increasing understanding regarding the evolutionary repercussions of ocean acidification; however, evidence suggests that some species may eventually adapt to exist in more acidic waters. For example, a study on Acropora millepora species showed a variation in the resilience of the coral's genes and identified that the species is likely adapting to the alterations due to acidification (Leiva et al., 2023). Nonetheless, the rate of change in the environmental conditions may be faster than the rate of evolution among the species, which can be a problem for very slow-growing species such as corals.
Scientists have noted that organisms with shorter life spans, such as phytoplankton, evolve more quickly to adapt to pH-level changes. In a laboratory, experiments on the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi, which is a calcifying phytoplankton species, have revealed that these organisms were able to develop higher levels of resistance to the acidic conditions in roughly 1000 generations, which are estimated to be one year (Armstrong & Law, 2023). Such a rate of change may have drastic consequences in terms of the marine food webs and carbon cycling in the sea. The sensory systems and the behaviours of marine animals are also being influenced by ocean acidification. For example, investigations into the effects of CO2 on reef fish have revealed that increased CO2 lowers their olfactory sensitivity to predators (Draper & Weissburg, 2019). Direct physiological effects might cause some of these effects. However, there is also likely an evolutionary diversification of sensory mechanisms and behavioural plasticity, which could reduce such effects over time.
Evolutionary Rescue and Extinction Risk
Evolutionary rescue has received much consideration with increased rates of environmental change and fluctuations. Evolutionary rescue happens when genetic evolution enables a population to regain stability and survive environmental pressure, which would otherwise have resulted in extinction (Jiang et al., 2019). Moreover, evolutionary rescue potential depends on specific parameters such as population density, genetic variation, and the rate and intensity of climate change. At times, evolution can happen fast enough to keep up with environmental changes that would otherwise cause extinction. For example, the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis) on Galápagos Island's living environment changed drastically in 2004-2005 when the island faced a severe drought that affected the availability of seed types the finch consumed (Beausoleil et al., 2019). The population altered their beak sizes within a single generation to a smaller size in order to feed on the new abundance of smaller seeds. Such rapid evolutionary change was necessary for the population to survive what would otherwise be a disaster.
However, not all species can adapt at such high speeds. Species with longer generation cycles, lower numbers, or lower genetic variability are more likely to go extinct when exposed to rapid environmental shifts (Kardos et al., 2021). This is especially worrying in today's global change when several stressors, including climate change, habitat loss, and pollution, affect numerous species simultaneously. The possibility of evolutionary rescue also varies with the type of environmental shift. Small and steady changes may give rise to occasions for adaptive evolution, whereas significant and drastic changes may exert pressures beyond a population's evolutionary potential (Kardos et al., 2021). Moreover, some environmental changes can call for the emergence of entirely new traits that are not previously seen, which is much more complex than altering existing traits.
Conclusion
The actual effects of environmental change are manifold and widespread, affecting all levels of evolution from genes to ecosystems. As shown in this paper, environmental changes are strong selective forces that often lead to quick rates of evolution. Global warming, deforestation, water, soil, and air pollution, introduction of new predatory and competing species, and ocean acidification are some of the significant environmental changes that influence evolutionary trajectories globally. Although some species have the capability of adapting themselves very fast, others need help in an attempt to meet the ever-increasing pace of change on this Earth. The capacity of species to adapt to such changes will define patterns of species distribution and ecosystem functioning in the following decades and centuries.
Knowledge of environmental change's effects on evolution is theoretical and practical, as it has implications for conservation, resource utilization, and policy issues. Understanding evolutionary processes and integrating them into the study of environmental issues can help better inform the conservation of species and habitats and drive an understanding of how ecosystems will respond to the challenges of global change. Therefore, a better understanding of evolution in light of the ongoing changes in the Earth's environment becomes more critical as society modifies these environments. Future research in this area must centre on understanding the evolutionary responses to the multifaceted environmental changes and formulating conservation strategies that will factor in evolutionary processes. Therefore, a failure to incorporate the principles of evolution into the study and understanding of environmental change implies that it will only be more challenging to address and prevent the further degradation of the Earth’s biodiversity amid these ongoing global changes.
Offload drafts to field expert
Our writers can refine your work for better clarity, flow, and higher originality in 3+ hours.
Match with writerReferences
- Andreasson, F., Nord, A., & Nilsson, J. (2022). Variation in breeding phenology in response to climate change in two Passerine species. Oecologia, 201(1), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05306-5
- Armstrong, E., & Law, C. S. (2023). The resilience of Emiliania Huxleyi to future changes in subantarctic waters. PLoS ONE, 18(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284415
- Beausoleil, M.-O., Frishkoff, L. O., M’Gonigle, L. K., Raeymaekers, J. A. M., Knutie, S. A., De León, L. F., Huber, S. K., Chaves, J. A., Clayton, D. H., Koop, J. A. H., Podos, J., Sharpe, D. M. T., Hendry, A. P., & Barrett, R. D. H. (2019). Temporally varying disruptive selection in the Medium Ground Finch (Geospiza fortis). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1916), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2290
- Bogin, B., Hermanussen, M., & Scheffler, C. (2022). Bergmann's rule is a "just-so" story of human body size—Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-022-00287-z
- Closs, L. E., Royan, M. R., Sayyari, A., Mayer, I., Weltzien, F.-A., Baker, D. M., & Fontaine, R. (2023). Artificial light at night disrupts male dominance relationships and reproductive success in a model fish species. Science of the Total Environment, pp. 900, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166406
- Draper, A. M., & Weissburg, M. J. (2019). Impacts of global warming and elevated CO2 on sensory behaviour in predator-prey interactions: A review and synthesis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7(72), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00072
- Halfwerk, W., Bot, S., Buikx, J., van der Velde, M., Komdeur, J., ten Cate, C., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2011). Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(35), 14549–14554. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109091108
- Jiang, S., Luo, M.-X., Gao, R.-H., Zhang, W., Yang, Y.-Z., Li, Y.-J., & Liao, P.-C. (2019). Isolation-by-environment as a driver of genetic differentiation among populations of the only broad-leaved evergreen shrub, Ammopiptanthus Mongolicus, in Asian temperate deserts. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48472-y
- Kardos, M., Armstrong, E. E., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Hauser, S., Hedrick, P. W., Miller, J. M., Tallmon, D. A., & Funk, W. C. (2021). The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(48), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104642118
- Kimmitt, A. A., Pegan, T. M., Jones, A. W., Wacker, K. S., Brennan, C. L., Hudon, J., Kirchman, J. J., Ruegg, K., Benz, B. W., Herman, R., & Winger, B. M. (2023). Genetic evidence for widespread population size expansion in North American Boreal birds before the last glacial maximum. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 290(1991), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1334
- Leiva, C., Pérez‐Portela, R., & Lemer, S. (2023). Genomic signatures suggesting adaptation to ocean acidification in a coral holobiont from volcanic CO2 seeps. Communications Biology, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05103-7
- Li, H., Geng, Y., Shi, H., Wu, C., Yu, Z., Zhang, H., Chen, L., & Xing, R. (2023). Biological mechanisms of invasive algae and meta-analysis of ecological impacts on local communities of marine organisms. Ecological Indicators, 146, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109763
- Mathes, G. H., Kiessling, W., & Steinbauer, M. J. (2021). Deep-time climate legacies affect the origination rates of marine genera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(36). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105769118
- Papadopulos, A. S. T., Helmstetter, A. J., Osborne, O. G., Comeault, A. A., Wood, D. P., Straw, E. A., Mason, L., Fay, M. F., Parker, J., Dunning, L. T., Foote, A. D., Smith, R. J., & Lighten, J. (2021). Rapid parallel adaptation to anthropogenic heavy metal pollution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38(9), 3724–3736. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab141
- Rato, L. D., Crespo, D., & Lemos, M. F. L. (2021). Mechanisms of bioinvasions by coastal crabs using integrative approaches – A conceptual review. Ecological Indicators, 125, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107578
- Robinson, J., Kyriazis, C. C., Yuan, S. C., & Lohmueller, K. E. (2022). Deleterious variation in natural populations and implications for conservation genetics. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 11(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-080522-093311
- Sackton, T. B., & Clark, N. (2019). Convergent evolution in the genomics era: New insights and directions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1777), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0102
- Shine, R., & Baeckens, S. (2023). Rapidly evolved traits enable new conservation tools: Perspectives from the Cane Toad invasion of Australia. Evolution, 77(8), 1744–1755. https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpad102
- Tian, D., Patton, A. H., Turner, B. J., & Martin, C. H. (2022). Severe inbreeding, increased mutation load, and gene loss-of-function in the critically endangered Devils Hole pupfish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289(1986), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1561
- Waqar, Z., Moraes, R. C. S., Benchimol, M., Morante-Filho, J. C., Mariano-Neto, E., & Gaiotto, F. A. (2021). Gene flow and genetic structure reveal reduced diversity between generations of a tropical tree, Manilkara Multifida Penn., in Atlantic forest fragments. Genes, 12(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12122025
- Yu, W., Wu, B., Wang, X., Yao, Z., Li, Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Scale-dependent effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic diversity of Actinidia Chinensis populations in China. Horticulture Research, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-00401-1