Social Work Rothman Debate R

The discussion of the issue under study brought out a few ethical dilemmas such as the tension between self-determination and professional ethics. Rachel, the Smiths' challenged kid, has to be adopted immediately. The worker understands that a thorough evaluation and support services will be required to make an informed decision. The Smiths propose that Rachel should be given up for adoption without delay. Mentioning their incapacity to live with a disabled child concerning rejecting responsibility as just a couple of circumstances in which they express their right to independence. The social worker's role is to ensure that Smith's decision regarding Rachel is the best for her advantage. The social worker, guided by professional integrity, is responsible for counseling, assessment, and adequate information sharing.

Making moral decisions requires critical thinking and well-informed judgment (Körner and Deutsch 1511). In such situations, the decisions process involves deep scientific thinking and sound judgment. Resolving moral issues in social work can be more complex if they become inconsistent with a social worker's agency guidelines and statutes or regulations. When first confronted with values and preferences, social workers try to provide a permissible solution in compliance with their ethical treaty and professional standards of practice. Before any decision-making, a social worker will seek guidance. This guidance will include seeking appropriate consultation when an acceptable solution appears inconceivable. However, these very same authorities, such as the committee of ethics, supervisor, legalization, competent colleague, or the agency of regulation, will likely join the conversation. Some critical ethical frameworks commonly employed in social work include utilitarianism and deontology. Utilitarianism enhances general wellness or happiness (Körner and Deutsch 1512). According to this framework, the ethical choice is the one that produces the greatest good for the most significant number of people. On the other hand, deontology is a branch of ethical theories that suggests that we follow moral duties and principles (Hennig and Hütter 22). Instead of merely concentrating on the outcomes, deontology pursues whether something is intrinsically good or bad as per the code of ethics or the principles.

Ethical Frameworks Analysis

Utilitarianism

While immediate placement may alleviate the Smiths' distress, it may not lead to the best long-term outcome for Rachel or the family. Thus, rather than focusing on short-term relief, attention to counseling and education would be more efficient in satisfying Rachel's requirements and creating the Smith family's lasting stability. The idea of utility, which advocates that everyone should strive to achieve the greatest happiness for the most significant number of people, is a concept that I wholly agree with. It requires thinking about the good and bad consequences of decision-making and choosing the option that benefits the most significant number of people. Conversely, it compels careful consideration by professionals on the likely consequences of their decisions, though they may, in the long run, bring positive changes in the lives of their clients and communities.

Deontology

In this context, the worker upholding the profession's integrity requires prioritizing thorough assessment and provision of necessary services over complying with the Smiths' immediate placement request. It underscores the importance of adhering to ethical principles, such as respect for autonomy and justice, even in situations where the results are too hard to achieve. Through this paradigm, I realized that the ethical obligations of social workers and the importance of the social work code of ethics are integral parts of social work practice.

Practitioner's Viewpoint

The practitioner discussed the delicacy needed while maneuvering these problems. He also noted that, in the end, it is always important not only to guard the interests of those vulnerable but also to take account of the client's autonomy. This perspective underlined the ethical imperative of providing comprehensive support and guidance to ensure the well-being of all individuals involved. The professional offers the client priority to ensure that the client does not make some of the wrong decisions. Social workers, while providing the client a platform to make the choice consistent with his belief system as the viewer, take the time to understand the bigger picture. They take the initiative of looking at all possible ways, and the client is provided with all the required information.

The practitioner also contributed the simple yet powerful element of self-analysis and professional collective works. Seeking advice from other social workers, reflecting on the situation, and listening to feedback from their peers and superiors will, for sure, equip them to make an informed, ethical decision. When integrating the therapist's perspective, the professional duties of protecting the client's autonomy and being held accountable for actions must be weighed equally. While being respectful of clients' self-determination, the social workers should be able to advocate on behalf of these vulnerable people, such as Rachel, and at the same time provide the support systems that will see them arrive at an informed decision.

Conclusion

The interview with the social worker practitioner shed light on the challenges and professional responsibilities of having balanced autonomy of clients and obligations of professions. By prioritizing comprehensive support and guidance for clients, social workers can uphold the profession's ethical principles and ensure the well-being of those they serve.