- Tailored to your requirements
- Deadlines from 3 hours
- Easy Refund Policy
How would you spend an hour of total freedom? In Kate Chopin's The Story of an Hour (1894), Mrs. Louise Mallard receives just that - one hour to contemplate life lived on her terms and on her own. Her response to the news of the unexpected death of her husband in a train accident shocks all, including herself. Instead of merely grieving, she feels something forbidden and deep, pleasure at the prospect of being independent. The main theme of the story explores the tension between individual liberty and the constraining demands of marriage and society that were imposed on women in the nineteenth century. The elements utilized by Chopin to form a story where a woman can be criticized and lament the constraints imposed on them and how short-lived freedom can be, including irony, switching of perspectives, and powerful symbolism. The story demonstrates how a society that is unable to acknowledge women's right to be themselves can damage them psychologically, in the case of Mrs. Mallard.
The opening of the story sets a world in which the main character, Mrs. Mallard, is characterized by her frailties and relationship with other people. The first line shows her heart ailment, which is not only a physical condition but also a living image of her trapped emotional existence (Chopin, 1894, p. 1). She is presented not by her first name, Louise, but through the surname of her husband, emphasizing the fact that she is a possession. This very first description is passive and fragile, a woman who should be treated with much care (Chopin, 1894, p. 1). Her sister Josephine and even the friend of her husband, Richards, treat her like some delicate object as they think the information about her husband's death will break her. As the story unveils, this is a profound misjudgment based on the patriarchal view of feminine vulnerability. According to one of the critics, the characters around Louise "read her into a double-edged stereotype that precedes her: repression and irrationality" (Masiero, 2024, p. 5). Thus, the author depicts how society tended to view the weak wife rather than the person lurking beneath the surface.
Leave assignment stress behind!
Delegate your nursing or tough paper to our experts. We'll personalize your sample and ensure it's ready on short notice.
Order nowChopin, however, does not show this awakening as a purely rational or triumphing process. The voice of narration indirectly contextualizes Louise's happiness as something that might be deemed monstrous and her state as a suspension of intelligent thought, which brings about ambiguity. (Chopin, 1894, p. 2). Han (2023) maintains that such a framing implies that Louise is trying to achieve freedom, which is a pathological emotional state and an unrealistic egotism (p. 69). In this opinion, the narrative is neither a feminist manifesto nor a satire of an unselfish and imbalanced woman. Nonetheless, an even finer interpretation sees this framing as a means for Chopin to demonstrate the tremendous social pressure to discourage female self-assertion. The feeling is "monstrous" precisely because it is considered so by society. The conflict inside Louise is an indication of the conflict between her own real desires and the hegemonic ideology that tells her she should only feel grief. Hence, she is not only desperate because she is married, but also because of the language that she has to use to explain her predicament.
The story's famous surprise ending delivers its final and most powerful blow of irony. Brently Mallard comes back home alive, and when Louise sees him, she dies. The fact that the doctors diagnosed her to have died due to "heart disease, joy that kills" is extremely ironic on several levels (Chopin, 1894, p. 3). Diegetically, the characters of the story assume that she was too excited to see her husband back that her heart failed. To the reader, who has been privy to the real feelings of Louise, the irony is atrocious: she dies not of happiness, but of the horrifying shock of seeing her freedom going away as fast as it came to her. It truly was her heart disease, but it was the torture of the broken heart that was fatal. This final is very strong in support of the theme of the story. Being in a world where women are not granted the opportunity to make their own choice, even a small dose of it, is overwhelming. The ending force, as Masiero (2024) claims, makes the reader reflect on "the final interpretation of Louise's cause of death from the privileged position of knowing which emotions Louise harbored in her heart" (p. 7). The final price of the repression is death.
Overall, the theme in The Story of an Hour is the sad quest of a woman to seek freedom. Louise Mallard finds herself and experiences the bliss of freedom she has never had before. However, this is not allowed in the society she resides in. The expectations and the rules form a prison. This shocking and ironic ending of the story displays that this prison is too powerful to escape. Her awakening is a short episode, and this episode is the cause of her death. It conveys a strong message about the necessity of individual freedom and the immense harm that suppression can cause. One hour of Louise teaches us that every man or woman should have the right to be their own person.
Offload drafts to field expert
Our writers can refine your work for better clarity, flow, and higher originality in 3+ hours.
Match with writerReferences
- Chopin, K. (1894). The Story of an Hour. Vogue.
- Han, W. (2023). The Story of an Hour: A Text Kidnapped by Feminist Criticism. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(2), 66-71. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1996-667X
- Masiero, P. (2024). Perspectival Strategies in Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour”. Lea, 13, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.36253/LEA-1824-484x-15557